Looking over the pop quiz responses it seems clear that: 1) almost nobody has read The Committee and 2) many people have not read, or at least fully understood, Hawkes. It also appears that there are people in the class who don’t know what STEM means.
Let’s take the first one last. STEM stands for Science Technology Engineering Mathematics– that is to say, those fields of study that are ostensibly the most “serious” and remunerative. (That they are routinely treated as such is already an indication that our society tends to treat rationality metaphysically.)
In the formula STEM s̅ dialectics → Hiroshima, “STEM s̅ dialectics” stands for what Adorno calls “instrumental reason” and “Hiroshima” stands for a moral and human catastrophe on par with the European genocide.
I’m trying to formulate a list of critical methods Hawkes employs in Ideology. If you have any suggestions I’d welcome them.
1. “X has become so pervasive it has effectively ceased to exist.”
This formulation ought to evoke paradox, the interpenetration of opposites, the dialectic.
I’ve not seen this film but it’s pretty clear the screenwriters (who are both from the Bay Area) have read some Marx and Engels. Though I’m not entirely comfortable with the trope of the earnest white savior, on the other hand nothing matters except getting free.